| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | If we upload images for use in the forum what should be the maximum resolution allowed? 640x480: 800x600: 1024x768: info: the colors have been decreased and compression is set at 50% | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | double post | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | My personal view: 1024 x 768
This still allows to increase the viewing percentage to 200% and the small print (left corner) "waarschuwing" is still readable. | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | I don't think a limitation is useful. I didn't even think it was a problem.
The size needed depends on what you want to show with the uploaded picture.
We should leave it in the responsibility of the users not to submit too large pictures. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,217 |
| |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 17,804 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote:
I don't think a limitation is useful. I didn't even think it was a problem.
The size needed depends on what you want to show with the uploaded picture.
We should leave it in the responsibility of the users not to submit too large pictures. ACK! We but we also should consider the online performance of the users. Loading big pics 1024x768 in true color could be painful for dial-up users. BTW: I would prefer 1400 x 1050  | | | | Thorsten | | | | Last edited: by kahless |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,494 |
| | Posted: | | | | I love the quality of Giga Wizard's Photos,, but I just feel that the pixel size over 1024 throws the profiler forum pages out to far to the edges where you have to manually adjust the horizontal and the vertical. ( I sound like the announcer from the Outer Limits..  ),, I just wanted to point out convienant an 800 x 600 size is for us all ..   | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,804 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,494 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just the Bedroom setup only.....  | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,804 |
| |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | The equipment is blocking the speaker! |
|
 | Ron | | DVD Obermotz |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 168 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Mithi: Quote:
I would say: as small as possible, as big as necessary.
And there is always the possibility of using thumbnails, linked to bigger pics.
cya, Mithi I like this the best, some of you unlucky folks are still on dial-up......... I want high speed, we my village has NO DSL, NO Cable, NO UMTS, NO WiMaxx Give us thumbs nail links and the pages open good and then we can open the images that we want. | | | Premium member since 29 August 2002 ---- 
Proud owner of a Phillips 42PFL7862D since 27 Oct 2007 :-D |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ron: Quote:
I want high speed, we my village has NO DSL, NO Cable, NO UMTS, NO WiMaxx Ever thought of SkyDSL via satellite? If you only choose "downlink" it's even affordable (not as cheap as the cable connections though). | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 922 |
| | Posted: | | | | I like the linked image better, my connection is fast enough but, like Terry said, the site layout is destroyed by this oversized pictures and sometimes I don't want to see this particular picture. And one click more isn't too much to ask for, is it? | | | 
Deutsches DVD Profiler Forum: www.dvdprofiler-forum.de |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ron: Quote:
I want high speed, we my village has NO DSL, NO Cable, NO UMTS, NO WiMaxx This was a news item on N24: Weil die Telekom abwinkte, greifen die Bewohner von Hegensdorf zur Schaufel: Sie verlegen ihren DSL-Anschluss selbst. (03.09.2007, 15 Uhr) Carefull YouTube video:Photo's of event | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | I wonder if someone can create a greasemonkey script that will resize overly large images down on the invelos.com domain? |
|