| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,366 |
| | Posted: | | | | Since the guideline "Do not link to individual movie reviews, only review aggregators such as RottenTomatoes. Individual reviews of the media (DVD, Blu-ray) are OK." mentiones both sites with multiple movie reviews and sites with single DVD reviews in one sentence, I think it's quite clear they should be both assigned to the same section named "Reviews". Besides, once the section contains more than one review it becomes an aggregator in itself. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
| Registered: March 28, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,299 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet: Quote:
Since the guideline "Do not link to individual movie reviews, only review aggregators such as RottenTomatoes. Individual reviews of the media (DVD, Blu-ray) are OK." mentiones both sites with multiple movie reviews and sites with single DVD reviews in one sentence, I think it's quite clear they should be both assigned to the same section named "Reviews". Besides, once the section contains more than one review it becomes an aggregator in itself. That's some good points. In which case I think the radio button should simply be renamed to avoid confusion. KM | | | Tags, tags, bo bags, banana fana fo fags, mi my mo mags, TAGS!
Dolly's not alone. You can also clone profiles.
You've got questions? You've got answers? Take the DVD Profiler Wiki for a spin. | | | | Last edited: by Astrakan |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2007 |  Posts: 4,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | Single film reviews should not be submitted in any category. Single DVD reviews can go under 'Reviews'.
This is designed to keep things manageable - there are already several excellent review aggregator sites such as RottenTomatoes. A single link to RT can and should replace many individual review links. | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative |
|
| Registered: March 28, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,299 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
Single film reviews should not be submitted in any category. Single DVD reviews can go under 'Reviews'.
This is designed to keep things manageable - there are already several excellent review aggregator sites such as RottenTomatoes. A single link to RT can and should replace many individual review links. Yup, we get all that. What I'm getting at is that right now the radio button for reviews is called "Review Aggegates" not just simply "reviews" which makes it seem like only aggregate sites like rottentomatoes.com should go there, and not individual DVD reviews. KM | | | Tags, tags, bo bags, banana fana fo fags, mi my mo mags, TAGS!
Dolly's not alone. You can also clone profiles.
You've got questions? You've got answers? Take the DVD Profiler Wiki for a spin. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Astra: You are trying to hard, amigo. It actually says Reviews/Aggregator, two different things from the way you are presenting it. It means precisely what Ken has edecribed.  Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well, the heading says Reviews but the submission screen says Review Aggregator (without the slash).
But I've changed my disc reviews accordingly, they now go under Reviews, not General Info. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Not anymore, Patsa. we are both wrong, now it just says Reviews. He keeps changing it. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2007 | | Posts: 4,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | I missed one spot when renaming from Review Aggregator to Reviews. The policy remains the same.  | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
I missed one spot when renaming from Review Aggregator to Reviews. The policy remains the same.  I'm glad it remains the same Ken!  | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote:
so if i followed the thread well then this one is no longer good:
www.mrqe.com/lookup?legend+of+zorro it works fine if you remove the www.invelos.com which gets stuck on the front when you click on it. like this | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | if you quote my text you see i did not stick http://www.invelos.com in front of it? verry strange?
What I mean is that the link to the movie review query engine should not be in the profile link to the dvd: the legend of zoro | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote:
if you quote my text you see i did not stick http://www.invelos.com in front of it? verry strange?
What I mean is that the link to the movie review query engine should not be in the profile link to the dvd: the legend of zoro The www.invelos.com got inserted because there was no http:// in front of the link - so it assumed that the link from this site needs to be inserted in front. | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote:
i
What I mean is that the link to the movie review query engine should not be in the profile link to the dvd: the legend of zoro I think what you are saying is that we shouldn't have a link to reviews of the movie? But this is a link to a site which provides a number of reviews for this film - and I think that is allowed. It is links to a single film review which is not allowed. | | | | Paul | | | | Last edited: by pauls42 |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote:
Quoting Giga Wizard:
Quote:
if you quote my text you see i did not stick http://www.invelos.com in front of it? verry strange?
What I mean is that the link to the movie review query engine should not be in the profile link to the dvd: the legend of zoro
The www.invelos.com got inserted because there was no http:// in front of the link - so it assumed that the link from this site needs to be inserted in front. yep indeed it was, your get so used not typing the http:// you don't even notice it anymore   | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote:
Quoting Giga Wizard:
Quote:
i
What I mean is that the link to the movie review query engine should not be in the profile link to the dvd: the legend of zoro
I think what you are saying is that we shouldn't have a link to reviews of the movie? But this is a link to a site which provides a number of reviews for this film - and I think that is allowed.
It is links to a single film review which is not allowed. Well i think in that case you could also include links to other search engines and I think that is not the idea to have those in with a profile. Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
Single film reviews should not be submitted in any category. Single DVD reviews can go under 'Reviews'.
bolded by me of course | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: by ? |
|