|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Home Theater Discussion |
Page:
1... 111 112 113 114 115 ...168 Previous Next
|
HD DVD and Blu-ray |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,911 |
| Posted: | | | | In the case of Live Free or Die Hard.... this was the word as to why... I'll leave it up to you to believe or dismiss. Quoting: The Digital Bits (9/5/07) Quote: By the way, while we're talking about Fox titles, we've got an update for you on the studio's forthcoming Live Free and Die Hard Blu-ray (due on 11/20). We've confirmed that the disc will include only the PG-13 theatrical cut of the film. This has upset some fans, who are aware that the studio is releasing an uncut version of the film on DVD the same day. The reason for the decision is that the uncut version was finished by the director only AFTER completing all the theatrical press junkets and promotional appearances for the film. Unfortunately, this was too late to complete compression and authoring for the Blu-ray version in time to meet street date. So the studio was basically faced with the choice of delaying the title or releasing the theatrical cut only day and date with the DVD. So that's the reason it's PG-13 only. | | | Signature banned: Reason out of date... |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,127 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting twojayz: Quote: "All of it comes down one thing. If you can't defend your position with hard science and not something made up, you will not convince me of anything concerning this HD format war. I don't refute things that can be proven through a scientific process (since some people have a hard time understanding what a fact is). Just about anything else is just crazy talk."
Actually I did defend my position using hard science provided by DTS and Dolby in regards to the audio capabilities of the formats, which you then discarded. That's my point, when presented with information that doesn't support your position you simply throw it out as garbage regardless of where it came from. Much like you tout the video codecs used by BD as if HD doesn't offer the same. HD titles are encoded using the much coveted VC-1 as well. I don't care which format has more titles available with a specific spec, if the capability is there the choices will come. And BOTH formats offer all the capabilities you say favor BD.
For the record, PS3 sales for August dropped 30,000 in a month (down to 130,000)...PS2 outsold it!
Here's the breakdown, the first number represents the monthly sales and the second is North American sales since inception...
Nintendo Wii - 403,600 (4.0 million) Nintendo DS - 383,300 (12.7 million) Xbox 360 - 276,700 (6.3 million) PlayStation 2 - 202,000 (39.1 million) PlayStation Portable - 151,200 (8.3 million) PlayStation 3 - 130,600 (1.75 million) Yes, you quoted DTS and Dolby's websites, but with what point? There was no point to tie it to. I know all about the website's information on DTS-HD MA, DTS-HD HR, DD+, and DD TrueHD. In other words, I discard it, because there was nothing for me to discard. Why are you trying to reverse the codec discussion? YOU talked about how HD DVD could produce the same PQ as Blu-ray using less bandwidth and space...as if Blu-ray can't and didn't use VC-1 or AVC. Both formats DO NOT use all the same capabilities. They use the same CODECs, but they CAN'T use the CODECs in the same way. Do you remember my post to you about BANDWIDTH? Well, that changes how well a CODEC can be used. Google search VC-1, AVC and MPEG-2. Lastly, why are you listing the sales of ALL console? This is a Blu-ray and HD DVD thread. The PS3 numbers are relevant, but the others are not. If we were in the gaming console thread, those numbers would be completely relevant. This is something I have a feeling you won't accept, based on your other posts. PS3 (EVERY one equiped with a Blu-ray drive to play BD titles) has sold more units worldwide last month than ALL the HD DVD players (standalone and 360 add-ons) since inception. See...that data is relevant to THIS thread. | | | To err is human... ----------- 473 Blu-ray Titles |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,127 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pplchamp: Quote: In the case of Live Free or Die Hard.... this was the word as to why... I'll leave it up to you to believe or dismiss.
Quoting: The Digital Bits (9/5/07)
Quote: By the way, while we're talking about Fox titles, we've got an update for you on the studio's forthcoming Live Free and Die Hard Blu-ray (due on 11/20). We've confirmed that the disc will include only the PG-13 theatrical cut of the film. This has upset some fans, who are aware that the studio is releasing an uncut version of the film on DVD the same day. The reason for the decision is that the uncut version was finished by the director only AFTER completing all the theatrical press junkets and promotional appearances for the film. Unfortunately, this was too late to complete compression and authoring for the Blu-ray version in time to meet street date. So the studio was basically faced with the choice of delaying the title or releasing the theatrical cut only day and date with the DVD. So that's the reason it's PG-13 only. Personally, I doubt that. I doubt it because Blu-ray can do "seamless branching". They wouldn't need to re-encode the entire movie...just the parts that would have given it the "R" rating they successfully tried to avoid. Not only that, but an industry insiders said that it take long to encode a day & date release (you already know the master is in good condition...no extra processes are needed) even when using AVC. Plus, the fact that there will be an unrated DVD version makes their explanation highly unlikely, but anything is possible. | | | To err is human... ----------- 473 Blu-ray Titles |
| Registered: September 7, 2007 | Posts: 265 |
| Posted: | | | | I didn't reverse anything, I have been trying to impart on you that both formats use the same basic technologies. I don't dicard that they are used in different ways. I never did. You read so much into every post that you always miss the point. I never even mentioned VC-1 until recently. I never claimed that BD doesn't support or use it...
I posted all the numbers as a reference point, in other words, to see how PS3 is doing in general terms. It's relevant since you keep boasting about the sales, not me.
If you're so well versed on all the specifications of each format then you wouldn't say the things you say, knowing that they are highly misleading if not flat out wrong. I thought you might need a refresher.
Ahh, to hell with it. You don't seem to have any concept of reality, I'm out... |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 103 |
| Posted: | | | | Quote: Quoting Calidain: This is my take on the PS3 gaming console. Upon its much anticipated release, hardcore gaming enthusiasts and SONY fanboys flocked to retailers to spend an exuberant amount of money on the shiny new PS3 and grab as many release titles as they could afford and find at launch. Within a couple weeks, etc, etc,etc/blockquote]
Quoting Ascended_Saiyan: You have some solid points in this post! Some of your points are slightly of base...numbers and dates wise. For instance, the PS3 owners getting boring after a period of NO games statement. The PS3 was first sold around mid-Nov. etc, etc,etc. I think Calidain has good points as well, and A_S sometimes you can let go the use of hard numbers. His use of numbers is not critical to his statements, so with that said on to my comments. These posts are bridiging the console/ hi def threads but I think they mostly belong in the hi def thread. I think the PS3 is a better blu-ray player then what's out there. In fact once they have a dozen or so games that are actually desinged to push the PS3 i think they should market it much differently. The 360 should have put a HD-DVD drive in their elite version. I think it's a huge mistake on their part. I think it would have helped HD-DVD a lot. When my console died (RoD) I took it back to the retailer because I had purchased an ext warranty I had the option of buying the Elite and payin g the difference. Had it came with an HD-DVD drive I would have done it. PS3 is expensive, but when put into perspective it isn't. The 360 would be put here if it had an HD drive, but it doesn't so i won't. A PS3 cost $600. If it had games that I liked and if most of my friends had one i would have bought one, but since they don't i haven't. For 600 bucks you can't get anything that comes close to what you get for that price. I was a pc gamer before i bought my 360 and i based my decision on what my friends were moving to. I was tired of always having to upgrade my pc. I replace my pc about once a year as it is, but adding a video card to that gets $$$. The last video card i bought was $375. Almost the cost of 360 and really close to the cost of PS3. I opted to spend my $ on a console and not worry about my pc so much. So if you factor a new Video card every 18 -24 months that covers the cost of any game console on the market today. And with that you get the best of all worlds. Besides most of the games are being developed for consoles anyways. now you can have a hi def player, a gaming machine and a mini pc all in one. So $600 isn't that much. So damn MS for not supporting the Hi Def market, otherwise there would be one more HD-DVD customer out there. Still not pleased with Sony. Maybe the near future will wash it away... we'll see. | | | Last edited: by graymadder |
| Registered: September 7, 2007 | Posts: 265 |
| Posted: | | | | In order to get back to the actual war, and back up my post about the business side of it all, let me quote an article I just finished reading. The entire article can be found here:
http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9689600
For a start, HD DVD is a cheaper system all around. Unlike Blu-ray, which has a much shallower (and therefore a more delicate) data layer, an HD DVD has its digital information etched deeper beneath the surface just like a conventional DVD—and can therefore be stamped out on much the same sort of equipment as a DVD. That translates into a larger profit margin for the studios.
Meanwhile, because of the robustness of the disc, HD DVD players have proved to be much cheaper to build. Models now start at $299, and are expected to fall to $199 by the coming holiday season. By contrast, basic Blu-ray players start at $449.
As far as stand-alone players are concerned, the price advantage has allowed Toshiba to outsell the Sony camp by a wide margin. More than 400,000 American households are expected to have HD DVD players by the end of the year, compared with less than 300,000 with Blu-ray players.
Why, then, have Blu-ray discs lately been outselling HD DVD versions by two to one? Because Sony cannily included a Blu-ray player in its latest video-game console, PlayStation 3. And while PS3 has not met expectations of selling 6m consoles in America, some 1.4m have nevertheless been snapped up since their launch last November. Market researchers reckon that most—90% by some reckoning—of Blu-ray discs are played on PS3 consoles. But Hollywood’s studios now realise they can’t pin the future of their precious video sales (today one of their main sources of revenue) on a game console that has failed to ignite widespread interest outside a dedicated circle of hard-core gamers.
That’s not all. Engineers who’ve worked with both formats say Blu-ray is a pig to program. While extremely flexible, its programming language, BD-Java, requires lots of low-level code for even the simplest of instructions. The highly skilled programmers needed to do the job don’t exactly grow on trees. And because of the program’s complexity, even the best produce their share of bug-ridden software.
By comparison, writing software for HD DVD using Microsoft’s HDi interactive technology is a doddle—with one simple command doing the task of scores of lines of BD-Java. More importantly, HDi is the key to HD DVD’s better navigation around menus, and its instinctive ability to interact with the outside world.
Thanks to the internet connection built into all HD DVD players, Toshiba machines allow users to do all sorts of nifty things—like re-edit films, participate in online polls and download trailers. Increasingly, it’s beginning to look as though, after the initial attraction of high-definition’s much sharper picture, interactivity is going to be the deciding factor that determines the outcome of the current format war.
DreamWorks, Paramount and Universal are betting that HD DVD’s powerful tools for interactivity will let them make a tonne of money out of selling all manner of online services to customers who buy their discs. That’s why, ultimately, Toshiba’s David could yet topple Sony’s Goliath in the current video wars.
Just something to ponder, unless of course business analysts also don't know what they're talking about... |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 103 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ascended_Saiyan: Quote:
Well, we know for a fact that the Paramount contract supposedly indicates they WILL be HD DVD exclusive for 18 months. Like the article said, that seems to contradict what they are saying. We know that FOX wants as much security as possible on their titles. That would seem to indicate a Blu-ray only situation for them. We ALL know where Sony Pictures stands on this thing. Therefore, that leaves Weinstein Company, Lionsgate, Universal Studios, and Disney.
Hard Boiled (Weinstein Company title) has already been contracted to be a Blu-ray exclusive as a double feature Stranglehold game and Hard Boiled movie on a 50GB disc. The RUMOR is that the contract has already been completely to bring Grindhouse (a Weinstein title) to Blu-ray.
So, do you guys agree with this article that Universal, Disney, and Lionsgate might go neutral in 2008? I think it's critical that both formats survive for the future of Hi def. Maybe Paramount/Dreamworks decided to go exclusive to make sure that HD-DVD doesn't fail. One format failing may cause the other to fail as well. You can bet if HD-DVD failed none of them would go to Blu-ray for a long time and vice versa. Unless they owned a dual format player. So as much as you discredit HD-DVD, the success of HD-DVD is as important as the success of Blu-ray. So killing one might and most likely will kill them all. The more and more I read it appears that this is the case. And maybe Paramount/Dreamworks saw this and opted to support the underdog and help bring them up to 1:1 with blu-ray and maybe by that time a low cost dual format player will be out and studio exclusives will be a thing of the past. *I realized i had Univ instead of Dreamworks in my post. | | | Last edited: by graymadder |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,127 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting twojayz: Quote: Forgive my memory here but I want to touch on the "both format" argument and why some business analysts are now saying this isn't a war Sony can win, yet not really lose either...Let me explain.
As some of you have pointed out the development and productions costs of the BD format were and continue to be enormous. If the war continues too long Sony will have to seriously look at how long it can sustain the costs. Some analysts don't think they can hold out as long as Toshiba.
Some of the BD capabilities Sony has claimed from the beginning still have not come to fruition. One that comes to mind, and please correct me if I am wrong, connectivity and interactive functions. They still aren't where they should be at this point. Most analysts will agree that this might come back and bite Sony in the a$$. Many of their initial agreements were reached with promises that didn't turn into reality, including the delay of the PS3. Again, this could, in the future (if it hasn't already) hurt business relationships.
Because of the high cost of production Sony lost profit on every PS3 it sold at least up to the past few months. That is what, six to seven months of losing money on 1.5 million units sold. Couple that with the fact the BD players and the software is still way too high to produce for a long term commitment by anyone, including Sony.
With the Paramount/Dreamworks announcement and some believing Warner to follow suit, how long will it be before a majority of the other studios drop the exclusivity to BD? If others realize they can make more money by either releasing on both formats or switching camps where does that leave BD? Speaking of exclusives, Onkyo is to release a HD player soon and Denon has not ruled out a HD player in the near future.
BD was rushed to market before it was ready. This has left a bad taste in many mouths. Blu-ray, as a format took a substantial beating with both hardware and software upon release. People still remember that. It's not living in the past, it's simply pointing out human nature. As a consumer, if any company brings a product to market and it hits with a relative thud, you have to wonder where the commitment to quality is. Even though a number of problems have been ironed out there are still issues that need to be resolved. People will remember the bad before the good in nearly every situation. That is the way people work.
One last thing is this...Sony has a horrendous history of releasing proprietary technology in stand alone products. Really the only success they have had in the past 3 decades is in fact the PlayStation line of product.
In short, Sony will have a much harder time actually pulling out a true victory than Toshiba will. Some will argue that Toshiba is a stronger company financially and can actually sustain the monetary requirements much better than Sony can. Especially over the next 12-18 months. That doesn't really mean that BD won't survive but HD won't be exiting stage left either.
In part, this has been a small portion of the basis for my reason to go HD. If even half of the above turns out to be true it could lead to extensive problems for both Sony and the BD camp. Specs aside, Toshiba seems to be in a much better position to at least guarantee HD DVD doesn't lose... I missed this post. I like this post a lot better than most of your other posts. This actually shows a pretty coherent thought process. The things that are messing up this post really deal with points over a year old (except the Paramount deal). I won't go into too many details unless someone specifically requests that from me. First, on the CE manufacturer side, it's Toshiba vs. about 80% of CE manufacturers (known as the BDA). Microsoft is not a CE manufacturer. The Onkyo player is the Toshiba XA2 with a minor refit. That's all manufacturers can do on the HD DVD side because Toshiba has pushed the price too low for them to profit. If you want to spend more than $450 for a HD player, why choose a format with lower specs, less manufacturer and studio support than Blu-ray? Maybe you didn't know this, but the PS3 is SUPPOSE to lose money for the first 2 to 3 years AT LEAST. Therefore, the PS3 losing money is the norm. It's business as usual. BD players use the SAME blue laser diode as HD DVD players (it was the most expensive component in the players). The software they are using in these low cost BD players is Linux. Linux is free, so just the labor cost to tailor the software is added to the cost of the BD players. As you can tell from my earlier posts, the cost difference is not great anymore on the low 1080p end of things. The PQ (not the SQ) took a big hit in the beginning. Since then the studios have dedicated themselves to the best PQ experience you can get from the master with the current level of consumer technology available. That is why Blu-ray overall PQ has SURPASSED HD DVDs level of PQ some time ago (according to 5 of the biggest online HD reviewers). HD DVD has never really been close to Blu-ray on the SQ side of things (like I said before). The Paramount deal was a shocker fo sure, because it flew in the face of all current market sales data. I have done the math of the studio support based on box office market share. Blu-ray STILL has around 50% EXCLUSIVE support while HD DVD has around 30% EXCLUSIVE support. The Paramount deal NEVER took away from Blu-ray's EXCLUSIVE support. It added to HD DVD's exclusive support, which was desperately needed for continued survival. Both HD players were rushed to market before they were ready. That is a fact. The countless updates for the HD DVD players, lip-sync issues, some discs weren't compatible, Children of Men disc issues with some players, having to BOIL some discs to get them to play, etc. Blu-ray player (Samsung) had noise reduction chip left on (resulting in soft pictures), The Fifth Element poor encode wth a few other titles, fimware updates for all players to make BD-J run better (except of the PS3), not having all the BD profiles come out in players from day one due to cost, etc. Sony's sucesses. Sony appears 3 times in the history of 20th century's GREATEST inventions. Microsoft doesn't appear in that listing. I don't believe Toshiba appears in there either. Did you know that the CD is one of Sony's creations? Did you know that DVD was partly created by Sony, Toshiba, and another company (Panasonic?)? Also the Walkman was created by Sony. I think they were pretty successful, don't you? EVERY company has failures. That is just a fact. It is the normal process of things. You can't say the products weren't good or great products just because people didn't buy them. Sony is usually at the forefront of innovation and being listing 3 times in the 20th century's GREATEST invention's list proves that. Past deeds of these HD players are one thing. They both had plenty of problems. There is NO denying that. But, based on what the formats are CAPABLE of in the FUTURE, Blu-ray is MUCH better equiped to handle it. For instance, there will be 1440P TVs in the near future. If HD DVD is having issues with squeezing 1080p and a lossless soundtrack on their format, it will be IMPOSSIBLE to do 1440P. Blu-ray could possibly handle 1440P with it's bandwidth ceiling. Although it would be like HD DVD now with 1080P, it would still be possible. You have to be prepared for the future as a format. As the specs stand, HD DVD is not equiped for anything but the present. That is part of the reason I chose Blu-ray. | | | To err is human... ----------- 473 Blu-ray Titles |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,127 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting graymadder: Quote:
Quote: Quoting Calidain: This is my take on the PS3 gaming console. Upon its much anticipated release, hardcore gaming enthusiasts and SONY fanboys flocked to retailers to spend an exuberant amount of money on the shiny new PS3 and grab as many release titles as they could afford and find at launch. Within a couple weeks, etc, etc,etc/blockquote]
Quoting Ascended_Saiyan: You have some solid points in this post! Some of your points are slightly of base...numbers and dates wise. For instance, the PS3 owners getting boring after a period of NO games statement. The PS3 was first sold around mid-Nov. etc, etc,etc.
I think Calidain has good points as well, and A_S sometimes you can let go the use of hard numbers. His use of numbers is not critical to his statements, so with that said on to my comments.
These posts are bridiging the console/ hi def threads but I think they mostly belong in the hi def thread. I think the PS3 is a better blu-ray player then what's out there. In fact once they have a dozen or so games that are actually desinged to push the PS3 i think they should market it much differently. The 360 should have put a HD-DVD drive in their elite version. I think it's a huge mistake on their part. I think it would have helped HD-DVD a lot. When my console died (RoD) I took it back to the retailer because I had purchased an ext warranty I had the option of buying the Elite and payin g the difference. Had it came with an HD-DVD drive I would have done it.
PS3 is expensive, but when put into perspective it isn't. The 360 would be put here if it had an HD drive, but it doesn't so i won't. A PS3 cost $600. If it had games that I liked and if most of my friends had one i would have bought one, but since they don't i haven't. For 600 bucks you can't get anything that comes close to what you get for that price.
I was a pc gamer before i bought my 360 and i based my decision on what my friends were moving to. I was tired of always having to upgrade my pc. I replace my pc about once a year as it is, but adding a video card to that gets $$$. The last video card i bought was $375. Almost the cost of 360 and really close to the cost of PS3. I opted to spend my $ on a console and not worry about my pc so much. So if you factor a new Video card every 18 -24 months that covers the cost of any game console on the market today. And with that you get the best of all worlds.
Besides most of the games are being developed for consoles anyways. now you can have a hi def player, a gaming machine and a mini pc all in one. So $600 isn't that much.
So damn MS for not supporting the Hi Def market, otherwise there would be one more HD-DVD customer out there. Still not pleased with Sony. Maybe the near future will wash it away... we'll see. I just wanted to let you know that the PS3 is $500 unless you are talking about the 80GB. | | | To err is human... ----------- 473 Blu-ray Titles |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 811 |
| | Registered: September 7, 2007 | Posts: 265 |
| Posted: | | | | First of all the losses on PS3 are much higher than "normal business".
Neither the Walkman or the CD were proprietary technologies. The Walkman was a portable product designed to be used with existing technology, the cassette. Therefore, in context of my post, doesn't count. The cd, as you pointed out was a co-developed product so that doesn't count either. Sony also contributed to the development of HD DVD...Did you know that?
I never claimed that the products that failed weren't good, I never even hinted at that. They have a history of making products that use proprietary technology that the average consumer either doesn't want, doesn't need, or doesn't care about. The PlayStation line of products is arguably one of the biggest successes of the last 30 years, and that's a proprietary technology as well. I'll give them kudos when it's deserved but the track record doesn't warrant a standing ovation. | | | Last edited: by twojayz |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,911 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Battling Butler: Quote: Quoting A_S
"Maybe you didn't know this, but the PS3 is SUPPOSE to lose money for the first 2 to 3 years AT LEAST. Therefore, the PS3 losing money is the norm. It's business as usual."
Wow, now it all makes sense! He's actually quite correct. The business model for video games is the system loses money that you make up in software sales for the first two to three years. | | | Signature banned: Reason out of date... |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,127 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting twojayz: Quote: In order to get back to the actual war, and back up my post about the business side of it all, let me quote an article I just finished reading. The entire article can be found here:
http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9689600
For a start, HD DVD is a cheaper system all around. Unlike Blu-ray, which has a much shallower (and therefore a more delicate) data layer, an HD DVD has its digital information etched deeper beneath the surface just like a conventional DVD—and can therefore be stamped out on much the same sort of equipment as a DVD. That translates into a larger profit margin for the studios.
Meanwhile, because of the robustness of the disc, HD DVD players have proved to be much cheaper to build. Models now start at $299, and are expected to fall to $199 by the coming holiday season. By contrast, basic Blu-ray players start at $449.
As far as stand-alone players are concerned, the price advantage has allowed Toshiba to outsell the Sony camp by a wide margin. More than 400,000 American households are expected to have HD DVD players by the end of the year, compared with less than 300,000 with Blu-ray players.
Why, then, have Blu-ray discs lately been outselling HD DVD versions by two to one? Because Sony cannily included a Blu-ray player in its latest video-game console, PlayStation 3. And while PS3 has not met expectations of selling 6m consoles in America, some 1.4m have nevertheless been snapped up since their launch last November. Market researchers reckon that most—90% by some reckoning—of Blu-ray discs are played on PS3 consoles. But Hollywood’s studios now realise they can’t pin the future of their precious video sales (today one of their main sources of revenue) on a game console that has failed to ignite widespread interest outside a dedicated circle of hard-core gamers.
That’s not all. Engineers who’ve worked with both formats say Blu-ray is a pig to program. While extremely flexible, its programming language, BD-Java, requires lots of low-level code for even the simplest of instructions. The highly skilled programmers needed to do the job don’t exactly grow on trees. And because of the program’s complexity, even the best produce their share of bug-ridden software.
By comparison, writing software for HD DVD using Microsoft’s HDi interactive technology is a doddle—with one simple command doing the task of scores of lines of BD-Java. More importantly, HDi is the key to HD DVD’s better navigation around menus, and its instinctive ability to interact with the outside world.
Thanks to the internet connection built into all HD DVD players, Toshiba machines allow users to do all sorts of nifty things—like re-edit films, participate in online polls and download trailers. Increasingly, it’s beginning to look as though, after the initial attraction of high-definition’s much sharper picture, interactivity is going to be the deciding factor that determines the outcome of the current format war.
DreamWorks, Paramount and Universal are betting that HD DVD’s powerful tools for interactivity will let them make a tonne of money out of selling all manner of online services to customers who buy their discs. That’s why, ultimately, Toshiba’s David could yet topple Sony’s Goliath in the current video wars.
Just something to ponder, unless of course business analysts also don't know what they're talking about... Concerning the cost of disc production. I provide the actual costs. HD DVD discs do have their information layer further away from the surface than Blu-ray. Blu-ray discs are more durable than HD DVD discs because of the hard coating on the disc. This particular brand of hard coating is not used on ALL BD, but a hard coating of similar protection is used. The rest of the article is about what HD DVD's tools that they can use and some of the BDA's weak points for those tools to be used on. Therefore, I can go along with most of it. | | | To err is human... ----------- 473 Blu-ray Titles |
| Registered: September 7, 2007 | Posts: 265 |
| Posted: | | | | When you look at the enormous losses they were taking on every unit sold and couple it with less than stellar performance on software sales...That's not a position Sony should have put themselves in to begin with. No, I am not including actual BD titles because as I said the production cost on those is still considerably higher than it should be even though they are selling.
Sony has taken a huge gamble on this with hopes that they would crush HD (and X360) and that hasn't happened as of yet. That's in part why I offered up total game console sales. PS3 is looking up at the rest of the pack and standalone BD players aren't outperforming HD player sales even though they have more players on the market. So, you have a relatively saturated BD player market that isn't performing to expectations and huge production costs all around. That's not a good place to be in from a business standpoint. They have all this product out there that at this point isn't making the turnaround financially. It will be a very hard climb for Sony and the BD Association, regardless of the numbers involved. Of course doing it collectively helps but everything that doesnt go perfectly will more than likely have a dramatic impact on the future of Blu-ray. That's not just my opinion either, I've already posted grumblings from the business world about this. There is alot of information out there if you look for, and of course want to read it. |
| Registered: September 7, 2007 | Posts: 265 |
| Posted: | | | | The cost of programming has to be included and looked at when taking the entire thing in. It eats up way too much time and time means money. Especially considering the level of expertise needed to perform the task. Those programmers aren't coming cheap and all figure into the overall cost, and lack of profit margin. That will impact the success of the product. Pricing will come down in time but the same holds true for HD. I don't think Blu-ray can be competitively priced to the average consumer anytime in the near future. By competitively priced I mean within 10-15% difference between models. For instance, if in fact a HD player comes in at $200 around the holidays, a competively priced BD player would have to come in around $220 - $230, nothing more than $250. That's not going to happen. |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | Ya know, half of you guy's arguments deal with how the other people don't comment on your quote. |
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Home Theater Discussion |
Page:
1... 111 112 113 114 115 ...168 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|